Court hears case over whether police used excessive force against protester

The judge who presided over the trial of a protester charged with assaulting police at the B.C. courthouse said Thursday that police should not have used excessive and unreasonable force.

The B. C. Supreme Court has ruled that a bystander, David LeBlanc, is entitled to a new trial for charges he assaulted an officer during a confrontation at a B. Canada courthouse on Jan. 28, 2015.

The decision, which is the first of its kind in the province, is expected to be appealed.

A decision is expected by March.

The case is one of two in which the BC Supreme Court is considering whether police acted properly in the arrest and detention of protesters who broke into a courtroom.

The second trial is scheduled to start in March.

“The fact that police had to break up the demonstration, break the windows and use pepper spray on a number of protesters, that’s not unreasonable,” said the judge who has been appointed to review the case.

“We don’t see that as excessive force, we see that in relation to the other three individuals who were arrested, they were entitled to their right to their own right to a fair trial.”

In court Thursday, LeBlanchy’s lawyers, Andrew Fauci and Daniel Dallimore, argued the court erred by ordering a new sentencing hearing for the protester charged.

“They (police) should have been more respectful and more cooperative,” said Faucs lawyer.

“It was a violent act, but it was not the most aggressive.

We think the officers did a good job.”

The judge’s comments were released after the trial was adjourned until May to give the Crown time to argue whether to call witnesses and to present evidence.

He said the Crown’s evidence was not sufficient to prove the case against LeBlancheys co-accused, Daniel Dross.

The Crown said LeBlanches role was to break down the doors of the courtroom.

Dross had broken into the courtroom through a locked door and was arrested while trying to break it open.

“I am disappointed the Crown will not call witnesses, but I am not surprised,” said Crown prosecutor Andrew Faucette.

“The Crown was very, very cautious in calling witnesses.

They had to be.”

Fauci, a former police officer, said police officers should have known LeBlancers intentions were not to break the doors.

“You could see that, you could hear it from the way he was behaving,” said his lawyer.

“In this case, he was breaking into the doors, but the door was locked.”

Faucette said police failed to use the right tactics to break LeBlANCs arm.

“There was no need to break his arm, they could have easily gone through his shirt, which would have broken it,” he said.

“It’s just that the Crown is relying on this police officer to make a subjective judgement, which he cannot, he is not an expert in that area.”

Dross was not called as a witness at the trial.

He did not attend Thursday’s proceedings.

Faucettes lawyer said police used pepper spray and batons in an attempt to disperse the crowd of protesters.

“He was on the ground.

He was on all fours.

He had his arms in the air.

He just stood there and watched the whole thing unfold,” he told reporters.”

His intent was not to cause any harm.

He didn’t intend to cause harm.

I think that the officers were acting in self-defence.”

He said it was an “excellent” job by the police to use force to stop the crowds from coming at them.

“This is a peaceful demonstration.

It’s not a riot,” said Dross, who was in his 20s when the violence erupted.”

At the end of the day, the police officers were there for the people and the police were there to stop people from harming the community.”

The trial of the protester and Dross was one of three trials involving protesters that took place over the course of four days.

It is the only one in the region to include evidence from multiple police officers, who are accused of failing to act in accordance with their training.

The Crown is arguing that the police acted in accordance because of the evidence, including video footage, that showed LeBlanes actions.

Sponsored Content

우리카지노 | TOP 카지노사이트 |[신규가입쿠폰] 바카라사이트 - 럭키카지노.바카라사이트,카지노사이트,우리카지노에서는 신규쿠폰,활동쿠폰,가입머니,꽁머니를홍보 일환으로 지급해드리고 있습니다. 믿을 수 있는 사이트만 소개하고 있어 온라인 카지노 바카라 게임을 즐기실 수 있습니다.【우리카지노】바카라사이트 100% 검증 카지노사이트 - 승리카지노.【우리카지노】카지노사이트 추천 순위 사이트만 야심차게 모아 놓았습니다. 2021년 가장 인기있는 카지노사이트, 바카라 사이트, 룰렛, 슬롯, 블랙잭 등을 세심하게 검토하여 100% 검증된 안전한 온라인 카지노 사이트를 추천 해드리고 있습니다.Best Online Casino » Play Online Blackjack, Free Slots, Roulette : Boe Casino.You can play the favorite 21 Casino,1xBet,7Bit Casino and Trada Casino for online casino game here, win real money! When you start playing with boecasino today, online casino games get trading and offers. Visit our website for more information and how to get different cash awards through our online casino platform.우리카지노 | 카지노사이트 | 더킹카지노 - 【신규가입쿠폰】.우리카지노는 국내 카지노 사이트 브랜드이다. 우리 카지노는 15년의 전통을 가지고 있으며, 메리트 카지노, 더킹카지노, 샌즈 카지노, 코인 카지노, 파라오카지노, 007 카지노, 퍼스트 카지노, 코인카지노가 온라인 카지노로 운영되고 있습니다.한국 NO.1 온라인카지노 사이트 추천 - 최고카지노.바카라사이트,카지노사이트,우리카지노,메리트카지노,샌즈카지노,솔레어카지노,파라오카지노,예스카지노,코인카지노,007카지노,퍼스트카지노,더나인카지노,바마카지노,포유카지노 및 에비앙카지노은 최고카지노 에서 권장합니다.